Throughout Cycles

Wel­co­me by the Edi­tor-in-Chi­ef

Pol­gá­ri Szem­le, 14. évf., 1–3. szám, 2018, 11–14., DOI: 10.24307/psz.2018.0802

Jour­nal of Eco­no­mic Li­te­ra­tu­re (JEL) codes: B20, N01
Key­words: eco­no­mic po­li­cy, so­ci­al po­li­cy, Hun­gary

We kindly re­com­mend you the com­bi­ned Hun­ga­ri­an edi­ti­on 1-3 of Vo­lu­me 14 of Pol­gá­ri Szem­le, our jour­nal of so­ci­al sci­en­ces. This pe­ri­o­di­cal pub­lis­hes stu­di­es in eco­no­mics and so­ci­al po­li­cy. The spe­ci­a­li­zed jour­nal is rated and pro­of­re­ad by the Hun­ga­ri­an Aca­demy of Sci­en­ces. Co­ur­tesy of our spon­sors, two is­sues are pub­lis­hed in Hun­ga­ri­an and one in Eng­lish every year, and from 2018, an issue will also be re­le­as­ed in China.

The aut­hors of our pub­li­ca­tions are high-rank­ing rep­re­s­en­ta­ti­ves of Hun­ga­ri­an aca­de­mic life, pub­lic ad­mi­nistra­ti­on, the Na­ti­o­nal Bank of Hun­gary and the State Audit Of­fi­ce, who pub­lish their ideas, em­bed­ded in an in­ter­na­ti­o­nal con­text and a his­to­ri­cal pers­pec­tive, in an en­de­a­vo­ur to give an over­view of the main eco­no­mic and so­ci­al de­ve­lop­ments re­la­ted to the Hun­ga­ri­an State, re-or­ga­ni­zed after 2010, and to the evol­ving aca­de­mic sys­tems. Our scho­larly aut­hors also give glim­pses of Hun­ga­ri­an his­to­ry and port­ray va­ri­o­us his­to­ri­cal fi­gu­res, the most re­cent aca­de­mic books are re­vie­wed, and even the fledgling at­tempts of and papers by young re­se­ar­chers are given room in the jour­nal. Ac­cord­ing to our self-de­fi­ni­ti­on, Pol­gá­ri Szem­le is a so­ci­al jour­nal in the ori­gi­nal sense of the term (inc­lu­ding the areas of law, eco­no­mics, so­ci­al po­li­cy, po­lity, his­to­ry and po­li­tics). In a more spe­ci­fic app­ro­ach, this pe­ri­o­di­cal tracks de­ve­lop­ment in so­ci­al sci­en­ces, ser­ves as a crad­le for new and novel aca­de­mic achi­eve­ments, and analy­ses the cur­rent glo­bal and na­ti­o­nal trends and events using sci­en­ti­fic met­hods.

In the first Hun­ga­ri­an issue of 2018 (an Eng­lish one was pub­lis­hed in Feb­ru­ary 2018), I would like to re­com­mend two papers for the re­ader’s spe­ci­al cons­ide­ra­ti­on.

Uni­ver­sity pro­fes­sor Mik­lós Maróth, clas­si­cal phi­lo­lo­gist and ori­en­ta­list awar­ded the Hun­ga­ri­an Cor­vin Chain and the Szé­che­nyi Prize, and a full mem­ber of the Hun­ga­ri­an Aca­demy of Sci­en­ces, has pub­lis­hed a paper about How to Pre­ser­ve Euro­pe’s Ch­ris­ti­an Iden­tity. At the end of the study built on the his­to­ry of the re­la­ted ideas and on ex­ten­sive re­fe­ren­ces, the aut­hor gives an ins­pi­ring ans­wer to the quest­ion asked in the title:

Ad 1/ “In order to re­scue Euro­pe from the harm­ful ef­fects of Islam, pa­ra­do­xi­cally, we sho­uld learn from Islam itself. First and for­emost, we sho­uld learn to take our own re­li­gi­on se­ri­o­usly. No­wa­days we can see that young people’s view of the world is no lon­ger sha­ped by their fa­mi­li­es or chur­ches, but by Ame­ri­can films and jour­nals. That is where they find role mo­dels and that is what sha­pes their fra­mes of mind. Howe­ver, these sour­ces are not aut­hen­tic, and the world­view they con­vey is in­com­pa­tib­le with our re­li­gi­o­us tea­chings, as they rep­re­sent a uti­li­ta­ri­an, ni­hi­lis­tic ideo­logy grown on the basis of Ger­man his­to­ric­ism. With a few ex­cept­ions, the chur­ches are not pre­sent in the pro­duc­ti­on of films that have se­ri­o­us mes­sa­ges and are ne­vert­he­less en­tertain­ing.”

Pro­fes­sor Maróth goes on in his ar­gu­men­ta­ti­on as fol­lows: ad 2/ “If we do not take our own re­li­gi­on and the cul­tu­re built on Roman roots and based on this re­li­gi­on se­ri­o­usly, and fail to set up strong com­mu­ni­ti­es, Islam, cha­rac­te­ri­zed by a strong iden­tity and sense of com­mu­nity, will over­po­wer us. The clo­sing up of Ch­ris­ti­an chur­ches will con­ti­nue, one after the other, while mos­ques will be si­mul­ta­ne­o­usly built, as we can see in va­ri­o­us count­ri­es in Wes­tern Euro­pe today.”

As an ad­di­ti­o­nal re­mind­er (ad 3/), he adds: “...​dialogue with Islam sho­uld be avo­id­ed when it comes to re­li­gi­o­us mat­ters. The rea­son is that Mus­lims are firmly con­vin­ced that only they have the truth and that we are fra­uds­ters, they will never give up an inch. Fol­lo­wing the laws of Islam, they un­i­la­te­rally want to pros­ely­ti­ze, and they des­pi­se and re­ject everyth­ing out­si­de Islam. They will de­mand the adopt­ion of their laws in our count­ri­es, and in the spi­rit of the pre­va­i­ling ideo­logy that is a co­rol­lary of Ger­man his­to­ric­ism, we will give way to it, as ‘everyth­ing is equ­ally good, everyth­ing is mer­ely an out­co­me of his­to­ri­cal de­ve­lop­ment’.”

In Mik­lós Maróth’s opin­ion, the way for­ward, or to pa­raph­ra­se it in a more com­mon way, our sur­vi­val re­qu­i­res the fol­lo­wing: “Eff­orts can, howe­ver, be made at co­ope­ra­ti­on with Islam to pro­tect our com­monly pro­fes­sed va­lues... As expla­ined by its le­aders on se­ve­ral oc­cas­ions, Islam can­not be glo­ba­li­zed. Thus, Islam can be our most po­wer­ful ally aga­inst the th­re­at of glo­bal­ism. We sho­uld learn the power of com­mu­nity and the strength lying in so­li­da­rity from Islam.”

In his paper, Dr Step­hen Count of Beth­len, a count of ti­me-ho­no­u­red Transyl­va­ni­an li­ne­age (his father, the late Dr Lász­ló Beth­len was an at­tor­ney, Mem­ber of Par­lia­ment and the Cha­ir­man of Transyl­va­ni­an Co­ope­ra­ti­ves, and his mo­ther was the late Coun­tess Ka­ta­lin Te­le­ki of Szék), makes a com­pa­ri­son bet­ween the eco­no­mic po­li­ci­es of the Beth­len Govern­ment after the Tri­a­non Peace Tre­aty and of the Orbán Govern­ments after 2010.

Based on Count Beth­len’s qu­a­li­fi­ca­tions in eco­no­mics, phi­lo­sophy and po­lity, his se­ni­or po­sit­ions held in the Ger­man eco­nomy and bank­ing, his cur­rently ac­tive uni­ver­sity pro­fes­sorsh­ips, se­ve­ral years spent in the Uni­ted Sta­tes, mem­ber­ship in Hun­ga­ri­an Na­ti­o­nal As­semb­ly as an MDF Party rep­re­s­en­ta­tive and his cha­ir­mans­hip of the Hun­ga­ri­an Pan-Euro­pe­an Union, he conc­lu­des that “gover­nance after the 2010 eco­no­mic and fi­nan­cial po­li­cy chan­ge has been sho­wing inc­re­a­sing si­mil­arity with the 1920s”. The in­ter­na­ti­o­nal fi­nan­cial ex­pert, who re­turned to Hun­gary on the in­vi­ta­ti­on of the late PM Jó­zsef An­tall, out­li­nes the fun­da­men­tal con­cepts, means and achi­eve­ments of his for­e­fat­her, PM Beth­len’s eco­no­mic and fi­nan­cial po­li­cy,1 and makes eff­orts at high­ligh­ting the les­sons that can be learnt today. He is lo­o­king for cor­re­la­tions bet­ween the past and cur­rent eco­no­mic po­li­cy events. He conc­lu­des that Hun­ga­ri­an Prime Mi­nis­ter Count Ist­ván Beth­len re­a­ched the sum­mit of his more than de­ca­de-long gover­nance in 1928. Ni­nety years later, it can be est­ab­lis­hed that under the le­aders­hip of Dr Vik­tor Orbán, who cons­iders the mar­tyred Prime Mi­nis­ter as his role model, Hun­gary is on the right track to­wards the cre­a­ti­on of a ge­nu­in­ely mo­dern eco­no­mic and fi­nan­cial po­li­cy rat­her than fol­lo­wing an os­si­fi­ed, 250 years old, ort­ho­dox li­be­ral­ism or neo­li­be­ral­ism that spec­ta­cu­larly fai­led du­ring the 2007-2008 fi­nan­cial cris­is.

I can also warmly re­com­mend the writings by cons­ti­tu­ti­o­nal judge and pro­fes­sor of law Béla Pokol; by uni­ver­sity re­ader Fe­renc So­mo­gyi, who or­ga­ni­zes civil dis­pu­tes at Lake Ba­la­ton; by pro­fes­sor of his­to­ry, Ger­gely Egedy, who li­kens the re­a­lity of Bre­xit to a Greek myt­ho­log­i­cal twist; by And­rás Giday and by many ot­hers.

We hope that you will enjoy this pub­li­ca­ti­on just as the pre­vi­o­us is­sues and will find us­e­ful in­for­ma­ti­on in it. Ple­a­se do not he­si­ta­te to call the at­tent­ion of your fo­rei­gn col­le­agues to Pol­gá­ri Szem­le, which is dis­pat­ched to the shel­ves of major in­ter­na­ti­o­nal uni­ver­sit­i­es and na­ti­o­nal lib­ra­ri­es, espe­ci­ally the Eng­lish and Chi­ne­se vers­ions, co­pi­es of which are for­war­ded to dip­lo­ma­tic corps and to in­tel­lec­tu­al work­shops in Hun­gary and ac­ross the bor­ders.

Un­for­tu­na­tely, as an edi­tor-in-chi­ef of a sci­en­ti­fic jour­nal, I re­gu­larly have to say final fare­well to our aut­hors who pass away, ack­now­ledge their li­fe­ti­me achi­eve­ments and place the flo­wers of grace on their in­tel­lec­tu­al gra­ves.

First, we rem­em­ber Szé­che­nyi Prize awar­ded pro­fes­sor Pál Tom­csá­nyi (1924-2018), who died on 22 Feb­ru­ary. With his writings he pro­vi­ded va­lu­ab­le input to our jour­nal on nu­me­rous oc­cas­ions, and rend­ered spe­ci­fic as­sis­tance to the aca­de­mic rat­ing of Pol­gá­ri Szem­le. Pál Tom­csá­nyi was well-ver­sed in such af­fa­irs, as his most im­por­tant aca­de­mic achi­eve­ments were made exactly in the field of sci­en­ce ma­nag­ement. In 1966 he ela­bo­ra­ted the con­cepts re­la­ted to re­se­ar­chers’ know­ledge ma­nag­ement and his book on re­se­arch met­ho­do­logy ran th­ro­ugh se­ve­ral edi­tions. Gra­du­a­te and post­gra­du­a­te stu­dents learnt from his text­books for de­ca­des. His ori­gi­nal, per­haps first, pro­fes­si­o­nal ori­en­ta­ti­on was the con­ti­nu­o­us ela­bo­ra­ti­on of the sci­en­ti­fic met­hods in ag­ri­cul­t­u­ral mar­ke­ting. I will never for­get his pro­po­sit­i­on I learnt for the mid-term exa­mi­na­tions du­ring my PhD co­ur­se: as the far­mers of Nagy­kő­rös car­ried fruit to the mar­ket­place in nice wi­c­ker-bas­kets, the mer­chan­di­se lo­o­ked and sold bet­ter.

Pál Tom­csá­nyi was a re­gu­lar mem­ber of the Hun­ga­ri­an Aca­demy of Sci­en­ces. He was the son of Vil­mos Pál Tom­csá­nyi (1880-1959), Mi­nis­ter of Jus­ti­ce in the Beth­len Govern­ment, and he was the nep­hew of lawyer and aca­de­mi­ci­an Móric Tom­csá­nyi (1878-1951). His nu­me­rous papers pub­lis­hed in Pol­gá­ri Szem­le called for re­ve­ren­ce for sci­en­ce and emp­has­i­zed the sig­ni­fi­cance of edu­ca­ti­on.

A final good-bye was also said to Zol­tán Jó­zsef Tóth (29 Ja­nu­ary 1967 – 28 Ja­nu­ary 2018), an out­stand­ing rep­re­s­en­ta­tive of the Doctri­ne of the Holy Crown and a law his­to­ri­an, who han­ded down his leg­acy to us in books he wrote and edi­ted. His books inc­lu­de: Hun­ga­ri­an Pub­lic Law Tra­di­tions and Na­ti­o­nal Cons­ci­o­us­ness from the End of the 19th Cent­ury to Date. Szent Ist­ván Tár­su­lat, Bu­da­pest, 2007; The Cons­ti­tu­ti­on of Our Sur­vi­val. The Doctri­ne of the Holy Crown in the His­to­ry and Pub­lic Law of Hun­gary. HUN-idea,

Bu­da­pest, 2007; Life in the Spi­rit of the Holy Crown. A So­ci­ety Built on Hun­ga­ri­an Va­lues. Ma­gya­rok Vi­lág­szö­vet­sé­ge, Bu­da­pest, 2011; Be­fo­re the Storm – At Cross­roads Két Hol­lós, Bu­da­pest, 2011; Prior to De­no­u­ement – On the Verge of Col­lap­se Két Hol­lós, Bu­da­pest, 2014; He edi­ted the fol­lo­wing books: The Holy Crown of Hun­gary and the Doctri­ne of the Holy Crown at the Turn of the Mil­len­ni­um. Szent Ist­ván Tár­su­lat, Bu­da­pest, 1999; Truth and His­to­ry – A Coll­ec­ti­on of the Ideas of Tamás Mol­nár. Szent Ist­ván Tár­su­lat, Bu­da­pest, 2000.

As an as­so­ci­a­te pro­fes­sor, Zol­tán Jó­zsef Tóth taught thou­sands of stu­dents at the Páz­mány Péter Catho­lic Uni­ver­sity, the Na­ti­o­nal Pub­lic Ser­vi­ce Uni­ver­sity and other hig­her edu­ca­ti­on ins­ti­tu­tions. His me­mory will stay in the souls of his stu­dents and col­le­agues, in his books and in his papers fre­qu­ently pub­lis­hed in Pol­gá­ri Szem­le.

We will rem­em­ber aca­de­mi­ci­an Pál Tom­csá­nyi, pro­fes­sor of the Szent Ist­ván Uni­ver­sity, and as­so­ci­a­te pro­fes­sor Zol­tán Jó­zsef Tóth, for­mer de­puty mi­nis­ter of state, and the edi­to­ri­al board pays tri­bu­te to their work and achi­eve­ment.

Dr Csaba Lent­ner, uni­ver­sity pro­fes­sor
Edi­tor-in-chi­ef of Pol­gá­ri Szem­le
Awar­ded the Of­fi­cer’s Cross
of the Order of Merit of Hun­gary, on re­com­men­da­ti­on
of the con­ser­va­tive govern­ment, on 20 Au­gust 2018

Note

  • 1. An ex­cel­lent and de­tai­led sum­ma­ry of the eco­no­mic and so­ci­al po­li­cy achi­eve­ments of the more than ten-year term of the Beth­len Govern­ment is given in a book en­tit­led Count Ist­ván Beth­len and the Hun­ga­ri­an Eco­nomy. An Eco­no­mic Po­li­cy Study (pub­lis­hed by the aut­hor, 1930, 192 p.).